<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nikon D300 Review</title>
	<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140</link>
	<description>Digital Photographs and Techniques from Harold Davis</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 02:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive: &#187; Processing Noise</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-59157</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive: &#187; Processing Noise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 04:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-59157</guid>
		<description>[...] been shooting in low light at ISO 6400, partly on the grounds that my Nikon D300 is remarkably low noise, and partly on the grounds that noise can be used as part of the aeshetic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] been shooting in low light at ISO 6400, partly on the grounds that my Nikon D300 is remarkably low noise, and partly on the grounds that noise can be used as part of the aeshetic [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive: &#187; Active D-Lighting</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-58586</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive: &#187; Active D-Lighting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 02:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-58586</guid>
		<description>[...] my review of the Nikon D300, I promised to look into its Active D-Lighting feature. Besides pure intellectual curiousity, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] my review of the Nikon D300, I promised to look into its Active D-Lighting feature. Besides pure intellectual curiousity, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive: &#187; Cataract below Mt Tamalpais</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-57045</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive: &#187; Cataract below Mt Tamalpais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 03:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-57045</guid>
		<description>[...] [Nikon D300, 18-200mm VR Zoom lens at 19mm (27mm in 35mm terms), 3/5 of a second at f/22 and 1/40 of a second at f/4.0; both exposures ISO 100, tripod mounted.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Nikon D300, 18-200mm VR Zoom lens at 19mm (27mm in 35mm terms), 3/5 of a second at f/22 and 1/40 of a second at f/4.0; both exposures ISO 100, tripod mounted.] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive: &#187; Tidepool Creature</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-56988</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive: &#187; Tidepool Creature</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 00:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-56988</guid>
		<description>[...] [Nikon D300, 105mm f/2.8 macro lens (157.5mm in 35mm terms), 36mm extension tube, 2.5 seconds at f/40 and ISO 100, tripod mounted.] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] [Nikon D300, 105mm f/2.8 macro lens (157.5mm in 35mm terms), 36mm extension tube, 2.5 seconds at f/40 and ISO 100, tripod mounted.] [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waiting for the Nikon 300x or Canon 5D replacement (3D, 5D Mark II, 7D) &#124; neutralday</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-56947</link>
		<dc:creator>Waiting for the Nikon 300x or Canon 5D replacement (3D, 5D Mark II, 7D) &#124; neutralday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1140#comment-56947</guid>
		<description>[...] appears that the D300 might very well be all the camera I&#8217;ll ever need, especially if reviews like this are to be believed, I&#8217;m still not a 100% happy about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] appears that the D300 might very well be all the camera I&#8217;ll ever need, especially if reviews like this are to be believed, I&#8217;m still not a 100% happy about [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
