Comments on: Tennessee Beach at Night http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368 Digital Photos & Inspiration from Harold Davis Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:55:56 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc hourly 1 By: Stacking Star Trails | Photoblog 2.0 http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368/comment-page-1#comment-68867 Stacking Star Trails | Photoblog 2.0 Thu, 13 Aug 2009 01:52:45 +0000 http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368#comment-68867 [...] on (which I generally do for longer "straight" night time exposures like Stars Rush In or Tennessee Beach at Night), the elapsed duration following the start of the exposure would be far greater than four minutes, [...] [...] on (which I generally do for longer "straight" night time exposures like Stars Rush In or Tennessee Beach at Night), the elapsed duration following the start of the exposure would be far greater than four minutes, [...]

]]> By: Setting Venus | Photoblog 2.0 http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368/comment-page-1#comment-68572 Setting Venus | Photoblog 2.0 Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:01:00 +0000 http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368#comment-68572 [...] This is an eight minute exposure showing Venus setting into the Pacific looking west from Tennessee Beach. [...] [...] This is an eight minute exposure showing Venus setting into the Pacific looking west from Tennessee Beach. [...]

]]> By: Photoblog 2.0: » Photoblog 2.0 Archive: » Stacking Star Trails: Tips & Techniques http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368/comment-page-1#comment-68348 Photoblog 2.0: » Photoblog 2.0 Archive: » Stacking Star Trails: Tips & Techniques Thu, 30 Oct 2008 16:34:35 +0000 http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368#comment-68348 [...] (which I generally do for longer “straight” night time exposures like Stars Rush In or Tennessee Beach at Night), the elapsed duration following the start of the exposure would be far greater than four minutes, [...] [...] (which I generally do for longer “straight” night time exposures like Stars Rush In or Tennessee Beach at Night), the elapsed duration following the start of the exposure would be far greater than four minutes, [...]

]]> By: Harold Davis http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368/comment-page-1#comment-68271 Harold Davis Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:21:55 +0000 http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368#comment-68271 Hi Ben - thanks for your great question. Yes, it is really a twelve minute exposure. Of course, there wasn't much light in the foreground, so if I was going to keep the ISO down I needed a long exposure. But the primary purpose of the 12 minute exposure was to create the star trails. Also, the long exposure made the soft, spread out effect out of the surf in motion. Best wishes, Harold Hi Ben – thanks for your great question. Yes, it is really a twelve minute exposure. Of course, there wasn’t much light in the foreground, so if I was going to keep the ISO down I needed a long exposure. But the primary purpose of the 12 minute exposure was to create the star trails. Also, the long exposure made the soft, spread out effect out of the surf in motion.

Best wishes, Harold

]]> By: benlwong http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368/comment-page-1#comment-68270 benlwong Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:52:02 +0000 http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/1368#comment-68270 Harold, As usual, incredible photo! My question is - Is it really 12 minutes for exposure? Why so long? Just curious and trying to learn something from a Master. Ben Harold,

As usual, incredible photo! My question is – Is it really 12 minutes for exposure? Why so long? Just curious and trying to learn something from a Master.

Ben

]]>