<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is It Photography?</title>
	<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647</link>
	<description>Digital Photographs and Techniques from Harold Davis</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Coleoptera after Warhol</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-52778</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Coleoptera after Warhol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-52778</guid>
		<description>[...]  Perhaps it&#8217;s just as well that Warhol came before Photoshop&#8230; 	Related images: Butterfly 2, Stained Glass Bug, Coleoptera.  	 					 				 					 						This entry was posted 						 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  Perhaps it&#8217;s just as well that Warhol came before Photoshop&#8230; 	Related images: Butterfly 2, Stained Glass Bug, Coleoptera.  	</p>
<p> 						This entry was posted<br />
 						 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Dragonfly</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-51248</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Dragonfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 20:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-51248</guid>
		<description>[...]  darkroom using masking, channel operations, and cross processing to create an effect that owes as much to painting as it does to photography.  	 					 				 					 						This entry was posted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  darkroom using masking, channel operations, and cross processing to create an effect that owes as much to painting as it does to photography.  	</p>
<p> 						This entry was posted [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Coleoptera</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-51198</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Coleoptera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2007 23:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-51198</guid>
		<description>[...] m the Cameroons, Stephanorrhina gaffata. I post-processed it in somewhat the same style as my Butterfly 2.  	 					 				 					 						This entry was posted 						  						on Sunday, December [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] m the Cameroons, Stephanorrhina gaffata. I post-processed it in somewhat the same style as my Butterfly 2.  	</p>
<p> 						This entry was posted</p>
<p> 						on Sunday, December [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; From Filter Play to Layer Masking</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-7273</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; From Filter Play to Layer Masking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-7273</guid>
		<description>[...] lter play, like this stylized version of a photo of a marble, with stops along the way for Warhol-like renditions of a butterfly, to more surreal and apparently photographic images like World wi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] lter play, like this stylized version of a photo of a marble, with stops along the way for Warhol-like renditions of a butterfly, to more surreal and apparently photographic images like World wi [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Xrays, Photograms, and Cross Processing, Oh My!</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-5028</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Xrays, Photograms, and Cross Processing, Oh My!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2006 17:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-5028</guid>
		<description>[...]  links: Photograms topic on my blog, Photogram portfolio page, my photogram set on Flickr, Is It Photography?,  Cross Processing, Photograms for the Digital Era, Rayographs. 	 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;]  links: Photograms topic on my blog, Photogram portfolio page, my photogram set on Flickr, Is It Photography?,  Cross Processing, Photograms for the Digital Era, Rayographs. 	 [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechNovelty  &#187; Ist ein digitales Foto noch Fotografie?</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-4862</link>
		<dc:creator>TechNovelty  &#187; Ist ein digitales Foto noch Fotografie?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:16:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/647#comment-4862</guid>
		<description>[...] gramme von Harold Davis&#8217; Photoblog 2.0 dienen. Er selbst stellt die Frage im Beitrag Is It Photography?. Tatsache ist aber, es ist durchaus möglich derartige Bilder auf analogem Weg zu er [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] gramme von Harold Davis&#8217; Photoblog 2.0 dienen. Er selbst stellt die Frage im Beitrag Is It Photography?. Tatsache ist aber, es ist durchaus möglich derartige Bilder auf analogem Weg zu er [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
