<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sensor Size and Depth of Field</title>
	<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/990</link>
	<description>Digital Photographs and Techniques from Harold Davis</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Nonpareil</title>
		<link>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/990#comment-42783</link>
		<dc:creator>Photoblog 2.0: 
   &#187; Photoblog 2.0 Archive:   &#187; Nonpareil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.digitalfieldguide.com/blog/990#comment-42783</guid>
		<description>[...] 7;s more depth of field because of the sensor size than I&#8217;d expect from my dSLR (see Sensor Size and Depth of Field). 	[Canon G9 fixed lens, appx. 70mm in 35mm equivalent terms, macro mode [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] 7;s more depth of field because of the sensor size than I&#8217;d expect from my dSLR (see Sensor Size and Depth of Field). 	[Canon G9 fixed lens, appx. 70mm in 35mm equivalent terms, macro mode [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
