I’ve been experimenting with my Kenko extension tube set and my 105mm macro lens in my garden. This combination gets me really close. There’s a whole new close kingdom of colors to enjoy!
|
I’ve been experimenting with my Kenko extension tube set and my 105mm macro lens in my garden. This combination gets me really close. There’s a whole new close kingdom of colors to enjoy!
|
Phyllis and I created this flowr pie using flowers (not flour) from our garden to enter in a flickr virtual pie contest.
Sometimes photography is about just being there.
Yesterday I was out with Julian at sunset just before his bed time (he’s eight). We hopped on top of Indian Rock just in time for me to snap this picture (in Landscape automatic mode, with a polarizer) of the sun setting behind Mt. Tamalpais. One second later, the sun was gone. Nothing much to it, except being there.
We had some cut asiatic lilies, and a bud came off. I looked at it, and said, “What can I do that is a little different?”
I love photographing lilies, but I wanted to try something new. This time I decided to see how close I could get. I stacked all three of my Kenko extension tubes (for a 6X extension tube, 3X + 2X + 1X) behind my 105mm macro lens, put the D70 on a studio tripod, focused the lens as close as possible, and then moved the bud closer to see how close I could go. As you can see, pretty close!
This is the small part of a lily that is in the very center of the flower. By the way, I am not a botanist – so if anyone call me what exactly it is I’d appreciate it. Note: It is the pistil, the delectable female part of the flower. (Thanks to MontanaRaven on Flickr for the info.)
Next stop was to experiment with depth of field. With the camera set on aperture-preferred mode, I tried almost everything betwen f/8 and f/40. This one at about f/32 seemed best to me.
|
The kids go down between eight and nine PM. There are three boys, and usually a fair amount of protest, fuss and cacophony. They do not go gently into this good night. Sometimes sweetly, but seldom gently.
The first order of business once the last bath is done and the last story told and they are asleep is a cup of tea. Chamomile for me, in my backpacking cup. Serenity.
I like the way this image came out, particularly the saturation of the colors.
There’s something about the mysterious that turns me on, and I don’t always believe in sharing how an image was made. Particularly in the context of todays hybrid imagery: one part digital photography and one part image manipulation using Photoshop.
There are various schools of thought about image manipulation. Some folk believe that only an image that has essentially not been manipulated in post-production process counts as a “true” photograph.
I come from a different camp. I care what an image ends up looking like, and I don’t believe in creating artificial divisions about the means to the end.
The truth is that all imagery is about manipulation of the physical world into an articial construct of pixels (in other words, your camera is manipulating). To pretend otherwise is to create an artifically segregated society of digital images, separating the “have-not” manipulated from those that have. Or the straight photos from those that have been gayly manipulated!
For the record, this image is fairly straight.
I used the wonderful feature in Photoshop CS2 that lets you use the RAW conversion settings from a previous conversion (since the other photos in my Crystal World set use essentially the same settings). I adjusted levels slightly, sharpened, and cleaned up blemishes, all part of the standard post processing of a digital image.
In addition, I sharpened the center of the fuschia a bit by selected the central area with the Lasso Tool and applying CS2’s Smart Sharpen filter with the radius set quite high to the selected area.
|
I was down with Nicky yesterday evening in Chavez Park in the Berkeley marina. The wind was blowing and the sun was setting. Nicky was playing with a little girl we met. Both kids were throwing pebbles into the Bay.
I had the camera on a tripod, with a polarizer, and stopped it way down. Post-processing included copying some clouds from another image from the same set onto a layer, blending with about a 70% opacity in Multiply mode, applying an nik Color Efex Bicolor filter (with user-defined colors and settings), a fair amount of cloning and patching, and the usual level and sharpening stuff.
I’m working on a large set of photos I created today. This is the first I’ve processed. Can you tell what it is? Hint: I shot this in RAW, so I needed to adjust the levels and sharpen it, also to clean up some spots and pixels. But otherwise it has not been manipulated in Photoshop!
|
I cut this honeysuckle blossom off the vine in our garden and put it on my mirror to photograph. I used my 105mm macro lens with an extension tube. The thing to realize is the scale: this whole photo covers an area about an inch high.
I think it looks extravagant – like a fancy floral bouquet. If one didn’t know, one would think the area of the photo was much bigger thanit actually is.
|
This rose in my garden is like a young child – just about to open!
Taken with my 105mm macro lens using one of my nice Kenko extension tubes, stopped down, on a tripod (of course).
This spider was weaving its web right outside our living room window. I photographed it against the sunset with my 105mm macro lens.
I recognize that this spider is a citizen of nature and quite visually interesting. However, I also think it looks a bit creepy (or yucky).
A kind Flickrite informs me that it is a common European garden spider, and essentially harmless. So the label is really unfair.
In the meantime, I used Photoshop to enhance the creepiness. Here’s the Ink Outlines filter applied on a layer copy using Multiply blending mode:
I think this effect makes it look like the spider is crawling up an eye socket! How’s that for creepiness?
This is a photo of part of the trunk and rear window of the Mondrian car, one of the special art cars here in Berkeley.
Looking through my photo archives, it seems to me that I take many pictures of Julian (my oldest son, who often comes with me on photo expeditions) and Mathew, our baby. But not so many of Nicky, our middle child.
Nicky is really wonderful, affectionate and smart, and just learning to garden. He’ll be four in November.
I took a series of portraits of him today, including this photo.
I’ve been rationalizing the organization of the my photos. This is nothing radical.
The problem is that the software that comes with my various cameras generates opaque folder names. For example, the Nikon stuff calls each folder imgxxxx (where xxxx is a four-digit number).
I stopped using the manufacturer’s software a while back (simply cutting and pasting instead) – but a alot of these folders persist. Depending on the vendor, they don’t have a date (Nikon) or don’t have a content description (Canon).
I’m just making sure that each folder (or, as they used to say, directory) with photos is named starting with the date the photos were taken and a slug that tells me roughly what the photos are of. For example, 2005.07.02 – Berkeley Rose Garden.
This naming convention is simple enough and it makes it a great deal easier to cruise through my file system (either using Explorer or the Adobe Bridge application) and find specific photos.
I’m about half way through the job of normalizing my photo folder naming (since I have a new additional Seagate 250 Gigabyte hard drive, for the time being I’m not running out of space!).
A benefit is that I’m finding nice photos that I missed the first time round, like this rose from the Berkeley Rose Garden.
More of my flower photos (refresh your browser to see a new selection):
|
I couldn’t resist posting this picture of our cute Mathew Gabriel from about six months ago…
More photos of my kids (refresh your browser to get another selection of images):
|
Harold Davis is the 2022 Photographic Society of America Progress Award winner
“Harold Davis is the digital black and white equal of Ansel Adams’s traditional wet photography.”—Seattle Book Review
“Harold Davis’s ethereal floral arrangements have a purity and translucence that borders on spiritual.”—Popular Photo Magazine
“Harold Davis is a force of nature—a man of astonishing eclectic skills and accomplishments.”—Rangefinder Magazine
Click here for what others say about Harold Davis and his work.
Most images available as prints. Please inquire. © Harold Davis. All rights reserved.